Tripp v. Pay 'N Pak Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an Oregon stat- ute regulating the issuance of stock options did not apply to Washington corporation
• explaining that an Oregon statute regulating the issuance of stock options did not apply to Washington corporation
• noting that ORS 78.3190 was intended as an “express correlation with the statute of frauds of the sales portion of the Uniform Commercial Code,” ORS 72.2010
• defendant's corporate minutes, signed by defendant, recited prior oral agreement and confirmed price and quantity terms
• defendant’s corporate minutes, signed by defendant, recited prior oral agreement and confirmed price and quantity terms
• so stating under statute of frauds applicable to the sale of investment securities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).