Conaway v. 20th Century Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that writings which merely show a plan, a proposal, or an offer which looked to some future relationship but which do not evidence an existing contract are insufficient to satisfy U.C.C. Sec. 2-201
• holding that writings which merely show a plan, a proposal, or an offer which looked to some future relationship but which do not evidence an existing contract are insufficient to satisfy U.C.C. § 2-201
• stating that “writings which show that the parties are still in the process of negotiation . . . do not satisfy the writing requirement of the statute of frauds”
• dealing with same subject under the statute of frauds provision for investment securities, § 8-319
• order of the trial court which dismissed complaint but invited reconsideration with the possibility of granting leave to amend complaint was not a final order
• order dismissing complaint “in accordance with . .. opinion” that invited reconsideration was not final

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).