Trigoso v. Correa
Citations
- 2017 NY Slip Op 3983
- 150 A.D.3d 1041
- 55 N.Y.S.3d 130
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Proof of visible intoxication can be established by circumstantial evidence, including expert and eyewitness testimony.
- Proof of visible intoxication can be established by circumstantial evidence, including expert and eyewitness testimony.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dillon, Austin, Hinds-Radix, Maltese
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- BOYLE v. ASAP ENERGY, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2017-10-24· cited 44×
- Soler v. JaccarinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2020-12-09· cited 5×
- Shvyetsov v. 1900 Newkirk Ave., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2023-06-07· cited 3×
- Ballard v. Sin City Entertainment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2020-11-19· cited 1×
- Acquafredda Enters. LLC v. Sterling Natl. BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2022-02-10· cited 1×
- Giordano v. ZeppAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2018-07-18
- Flynn v. Bulldogs Run Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2019-04-24
- Earle v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2024-01-31
- Simmons v. VecchianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2024-12-04
- Paxton v. SosnowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2025-05-07
- Bisono v. Viva Viva TaqueriaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2025-08-06
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Vega v. Restani Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 2012-02-16· cited 1,791×
- Romano v. StanleyNew York Court of Appeals· 1997-07-01· cited 211×
- Adamy v. ZiriakusNew York Court of Appeals· 1998-11-18· cited 68×
- Schwelnus v. Urological Associates of L.I., P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2012-04-17· cited 25×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-09-11· cited 22×
- Pinilla v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2016-02-10· cited 15×
- Castor v. CuevasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2016-03-02· cited 14×
- Wasserman v. GodoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-01-19· cited 13×
- Cruz v. FinneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2017-03-08· cited 12×
- Sullivan v. Mulinos of Westchester, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-05-18· cited 11×
- Hackney v. MongeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2013-02-27· cited 11×
- Pech v. Yael Taxi Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-03-31· cited 11×
- Dugan v. OlsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-06-22· cited 10×
- Conklin v. TraversAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-06-10· cited 8×
- Defina v. DanielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2016-06-08· cited 8×
- Poppke v. Portugese American Club of MineolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2011-06-07· cited 7×
- Sherwood v. Otto Jazz, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2016-09-28· cited 5×
- Pouncey v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2016-01-13· cited 4×
- Boudine v. Goldmaker, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-07-01· cited 2×
- 30 Clinton Place Owners, Inc. v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-08-05· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.