· 7/1/1997
Romano v. Stanley
Citations
- 684 N.E.2d 19
- 90 N.Y.2d 444
- 661 N.Y.S.2d 589
- 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 1387
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing the types of evidence admissible to demonstrate “intoxication” for dram shop liability
- circumstantial evidence may be used to show visible intoxication, but a visibly intoxicated standard is not met by proof of blood alcohol alone
- circumstantial evidence may be used to show visible intoxication, but a visibly intoxicated standard is not met by proof of blood alcohol alone
- circumstantial evidence may be used to show visible intoxication, but a visibly intoxicated standard is not met by proof of blood alcohol alone
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Titone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.