· 11/8/2002
Tremblay v. Philip Morris, Inc.
Citations
- 231 F. Supp. 2d 411
- 2002 DNH 201
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23207
- 2002 WL 31506149
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analyzing plaintiffs motion to remand for insufficient amount in controversy on basis of allegations in complaint despite its lack of quantified demand
- stating that although defendant participates in a regulated industry, “this is not enough to demonstrate that it acted under the direction of a federal officer when it designed its light cigarettes and elected to market them as low in tar and nicotine.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barbadoro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.