Skip to main content
· 11/8/2002

Tremblay v. Philip Morris, Inc.

Citations

  • 231 F. Supp. 2d 411
  • 2002 DNH 201
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23207
  • 2002 WL 31506149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing plaintiffs motion to remand for insufficient amount in controversy on basis of allegations in complaint despite its lack of quantified demand
  • stating that although defendant participates in a regulated industry, “this is not enough to demonstrate that it acted under the direction of a federal officer when it designed its light cigarettes and elected to market them as low in tar and nicotine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbadoro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.