Skip to main content
· 9/10/2001

Susan Kanter Sharon Plunk v. Warner-Lambert Co. And Pfizer Inc.

Citations

  • 265 F.3d 853
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7949
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 9819
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20137
  • 2001 WL 1028307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a party seeking to invoke diversity jurisdiction should be able to allege affirmatively the actual citizenship of the relevant parties”
  • holding that a complaint was deficient where it merely alleged 16 that several corporate defendants “were not citizens of California”
  • holding that there was no diversity jurisdiction where plaintiff made allegations of residency but not citizenship
  • holding that remand for defective diversity allegations was unreviewable even though the removing defendant “could potentially have cured its defective allegations regarding citizenship by amending its notice of removal”
  • holding that defendant failed to plead diversity jurisdiction when it did not “affirmatively allege the state of citizenship of corporate defendants” but rather “merely alleged that they were not citizens of California”
  • holding that defendant failed to plead diversity jurisdiction when it did not “affirmatively allege the state of citizenship of corporate defendants” but rather “merely alleged that they were not citizens of California”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Hall, Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.