Towbridge v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that after revoking defendant’s probation, trial court was required to reimpose original sentences as concurrent, not consecutive, when defendant initially received concurrent “true split sentences”
• holding that after revoking defendant’s probation, trial court was required to reimpose original sentences as concurrent, not consecutive, when defendant initially received concurrent “true split sentences”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McCaskill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-12· cited 4×
• Coney v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-15· cited 1×
• Powers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-10· cited 1×
• Brooker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-29

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Poore v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-22· cited 288×
• Montgomery v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-07-31· cited 3×