Skip to main content

Toth v. Square D Company

Citations

  • 377 S.E.2d 584
  • 298 S.C. 6
  • 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 396
  • 1989 S.C. LEXIS 39

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating judicial decisions which create liability where none previously existed must be given prospective application
  • retroactively applying prior decision that allowed evidence of employee handbook provisions in an action against employer because the decision merely created a new remedy to vindicate the existing right to bring a breach of contract action
  • retroactively applying prior decision that allowed evidence of employee handbook provisions in an action against employer because the decision merely created a new remedy to vindicate the existing right to bring a breach of contract action
  • “Prospective application is required when liability is created where formerly none existed.”
  • \Prospective application is required when liability is created where formerly none existed.\
  • the use of an employee handbook provision in the construction of an employment relationship is not a novel idea in South Carolina, citing Dew v. City of Florence, 279 S. C. 155, 303 S. E. (2d) 664 (1983) and Hogsed v. Lancaster Area School Board of Trustees, 283 S. C. 42, 320 S. E. (2d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gregory, Finney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.