Walton v. Stewart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wherein the Supreme Court’s holding in Elam v. Elam, 275 S. C. 132, 268 S. E. (2d) 109 (1980), the decision that abrogated inter-family immunity, held not to apply where the facts giving rise to the litigation occurred before the Supreme Court abolished the doctrine
• abrogation of interfamily immunity 3 not retroactively applied
• abrogation of interfamily immunity [3] not retroactively applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).