Court of Appeals of Maryland· 10/10/1985
Toner v. Baltimore Envelope Co.
Citations
- 498 A.2d 642
- 304 Md. 256
- 1985 Md. LEXIS 878
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- answering certified question from U.S. District Court and rejecting strict equal opportunity rule; no bad faith or malice alleged
- referring to the rule in denying injunction against closely held corporation on behalf of minority holder of nonvoting stock requiring corporation to purchase nonvoting stock at specific price
- referring to the rule in denying injunction against closely held corporation on behalf of minority holder of nonvoting stock requiring corporation to purchase nonvoting stock at specific price
- equal opportunity doctrine not applicable where corporation purchased non-voting stock from some shareholders
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Smith, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Orth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bayberry Associates v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court· 1990-01-22· cited 418×
- Lee C. Ritchie v. Ann Caldwell Rupe, as Trustee for the Dallas Gordon Rupe, III 1995 Family TrustTexas Supreme Court· 2014-06-20· cited 170×
- Sadler v. Dimensions Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-11-26· cited 56×
- Hollis v. HillFifth Circuit· 2000-11-17· cited 41×
- Strougo v. BassiniSecond Circuit· 2002-02-28· cited 27×
- Pittman v. American Metal Forming Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-11-04· cited 14×
- Grato v. GratoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-04-06· cited 12×
- Delahoussaye v. NewhardMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-01-16· cited 9×
- Bailey v. VaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1987-07-22· cited 8×
- Frank v. LoVetereD. Connecticut· 2005-03-31· cited 4×
- Strougo ex rel. Brazilian Equity Fund, Inc. v. BassiniSecond Circuit· 2002-02-28· cited 2×
- Carstarphen v. MilsnerD. Nevada· 2010-01-05· cited 1×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court· 1919-06-09· cited 350×
- Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-05-02· cited 335×
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court· 1969-11-07· cited 284×
- Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationSecond Circuit· 1955-01-26· cited 181×
- Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1977-09-23· cited 161×
- Wilkes v. Springside Nursing Home, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-08-20· cited 151×
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-11-09· cited 86×
- Merchants Mortgage Co. v. LubowCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-06-16· cited 58×
- Levin v. LevinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-09-11· cited 46×
- Alaska Plastics, Inc. v. CoppockAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-12-12· cited 46×
- Ned McDaniel Mary E. McDaniel and Robert A. Collier v. R. D. Painter, Dale Painter and Rhodes DanehowerTenth Circuit· 1969-12-01· cited 44×
- Shaw v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1894-01-11· cited 33×
- Devereux v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-01-14· cited 30×
- Twenty Seven Trust v. Realty Growth InvestorsD. Maryland· 1982-02-22· cited 26×
- Cummings v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-11-25· cited 22×
- Tillis v. United Parts, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-03-25· cited 21×
- Cooperative Milk Service, Inc. v. HepnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1951-05-24· cited 19×
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. Bendix Corp.D. Maryland· 1982-09-22· cited 19×
- Comolli v. ComolliSupreme Court of Georgia· 1978-04-18· cited 18×
- Baker v. Standard Lime & Stone Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-28· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.