Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 11/17/2000

Hollis v. Hill

Citations

  • 232 F.3d 460
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 29343
  • 2000 WL 1644133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was “strong indication that the Nevada Supreme Court would find fiduciary obligations between shareholders in a corporation such as FFUSA operated by shareholder-directors”
  • holding that there was ''strong indication that the Nevada Supreme Court would find fiduciary obligations between shareholders in a corporation such as FFUSA operated by shareholder· djrectors''
  • holding the presumptive valuation date on a freeze-out claim to be the date of filing the suit
  • noting that Donahue’s “recognition of special rules of fiduciary duty applicable to close corporations has gained widespread acceptance”
  • noting that definitions of minority shareholder oppression usually take one of these three forms
  • looking to the law of other jurisdictions because Nevada had not addressed the relevant issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Jolly, Barksdale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.