California Court of Appeal· 2/7/1978
Tolstoy Constructor Co. v. Minter
Citations
- 78 Cal. App. 3d 665
- 143 Cal. Rptr. 570
- 1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1339
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The doctrine of substantial performance has been recognized in California since at least 1921.”
- many relatively small defects in construction of a house
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jefferson (Bernard)
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court· 1974-12-10· cited 472×
- Horn v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court· 1976-06-30· cited 76×
- Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-10-20· cited 28×
- Lowy v. United Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-07-21· cited 13×
- Williams v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-09-13· cited 10×
- Bause v. Anthony Pools, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1962-07-13· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.