Mississippi Supreme Court· 8/12/1987
Tolbert v. State
Citations
- 511 So. 2d 1368
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no due process violation where State destroyed particle of skin which could not have sustained defense theory of the case in context of all the evidence
- finding no due process violation where State destroyed particle of skin which could not have sustained defense theory of the case in context of all the evidence
- finding no due process violation where State destroyed particle of skin which could not have sustained defense theory of the case in context of all the evidence
- “. . . [T]he mere possibility the evidence might aid the defense does not satisfy the constitutional materiality standard.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hawkins, P.J., and Robertson and Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
107 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hansen v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-12-18· cited 521×
- Chase v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-02-24· cited 466×
- Taylor v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1996-04-25· cited 406×
- Nixon v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1987-11-25· cited 322×
- Lockett v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1987-09-30· cited 313×
- Eakes v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1995-10-26· cited 240×
- Leatherwood v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-07-19· cited 232×
- Duplantis v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-03-12· cited 147×
- Porter v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1993-04-01· cited 121×
- Nicholson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1988-03-16· cited 103×
- Moore v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2006-04-27· cited 93×
- Manix v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2005-02-17· cited 87×
- Mitchell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-02-27· cited 86×
- State v. DavlinNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-03-01· cited 82×
- Veal v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-08-07· cited 80×
- Cox v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-08-28· cited 77×
- Sewell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-10-15· cited 76×
- Johnston v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1993-04-22· cited 70×
- Farris v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2000-06-08· cited 65×
- Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2003-02-20· cited 60×
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Cabello v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-05-01· cited 348×
- Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-11-28· cited 325×
- Laney v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1982-10-13· cited 250×
- United States v. Jimmy Dewitt Webster, Sr., Candido Daniel Santiago, Barry Weinreich, Joe Buhajla, Arthur Byron Murphy, and Clarence RoyalstonFifth Circuit· 1985-01-28· cited 248×
- Agee v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1966-04-25· cited 182×
- Odom v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1978-03-15· cited 120×
- Barnes v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-11-21· cited 85×
- United States v. Manuel Binker, A/K/A ManoloFifth Circuit· 1986-08-05· cited 61×
- United States v. Bobby J. HerndonFifth Circuit· 1976-08-06· cited 55×
- Washington v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-10-16· cited 44×
- Lee v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1959-05-25· cited 41×
- Pennington v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1983-08-31· cited 40×
- Norman v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1974-10-28· cited 37×
- Dase v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1978-03-29· cited 32×
- Hemmingway v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 31×
- Barker v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-02-06· cited 30×
- Coyne v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-02-26· cited 28×
- Scott v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1978-05-17· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.