Tobin v. People
Citations
- 101 Ill. 121
- 1881 Ill. LEXIS 54
Syllabus
<p>1. Instructions—failure to mark as “given.” A judgment of conviction in a criminal case will not be reversed merely because the court failed to mark two of the defendant’s instructions as “given,” where the record shows they were given to the jury as asked.</p> <p>2. New trial—/or newly discovered evidence. A new trial will not be granted on the ground of newly discovered evidence, where it does not appear but the evidence might have been had on the trial by the exercise of reasonable diligence, nor where such evidence is in its nature impeaching, only.</p> <p>3. Same—absence of witness by sickness. Anew trial will not be granted in a criminal case because an important witness was prevented from attending the trial by sickness, and the prisoner’s counsel failed to bring such fact to the notice of the court. The party in such case should have asked for a continuance.</p>
Judges: Dickey, Sheldon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksSupreme Court of Alabama· 1918-04-18· cited 74×
- Daxanbeklar v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois· 1901-02-13· cited 11×
- Lathrop v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1902-06-19· cited 9×
- Springer v. SchultzAppellate Court of Illinois· 1903-01-30· cited 5×
- The People v. LawsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1928-02-24· cited 4×
- People v. MarksIllinois Supreme Court· 1911-10-25· cited 3×
- World's Columbian Exposition v. BellAppellate Court of Illinois· 1898-05-31· cited 1×
- Pate v. RodmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1929-06-11
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.