McKenzie v. Remington
Citations
- 79 Ill. 388
Syllabus
<p>I. New trial—newly discovered evidence. Where newly discovered evidence is merely cumulative, and not of a conclusive character, it is not a sufficient ground for granting a new trial.</p> <p>3. Instructions—clerical mistake in. Where the word plaintiff is used in an instruction instead of the word defendant, and the mistake is so palpable as to correct itself on a reading, it will be no ground for a reversal.</p> <p>3. Same—marking as given. A judgment will not be reversed because instructions are not marked “given,” when the. record shows that they were in fact given.</p>
Judges: Sheldon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tobin v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1881-11-10· cited 10×
- North Chicago Street Railroad v. LeonardIllinois Supreme Court· 1897-05-11· cited 7×
- City of East Dubuque v. BurhyteAppellate Court of Illinois· 1897-12-17· cited 7×
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. SullivanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1886-12-11· cited 4×
- Norman Frame & Son v. MurphyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1895-01-24· cited 1×
- Theile v. Chicago Brick Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1895-12-02· cited 1×
- Harrigan v. TurnerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1896-06-01
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.