Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2/25/1986
Tinsley v. State
Citations
- 485 So. 2d 1249
- 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5955
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- wherein the court held that \a void indictment gives the court no jurisdiction to proceed against an accused and the defect of an indictment which fails to charge an offense is not waived by a plea of guilty\
- wherein the court, in following Dingler , held that \a void indictment gives the court no jurisdiction to proceed against an accused and the defect of an indictment which fails to charge an offense is not waived by a plea of guilty\
- wherein the court, in following Dingler , held that 'a void indictment gives the court no jurisdiction to proceed against an accused and the defect of an indictment which fails to charge an offense is not waived by a plea of guilty'
- wherein the court, in following Dingler , held that \a void indictment gives the court no jurisdiction to proceed against an accused and [that] the defect of an indictment which fails to charge an offense is not waived by a plea of guilty\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-06-28· cited 91×
- Holder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-04-26· cited 65×
- Ex Parte RiversSupreme Court of Alabama· 1991-12-13· cited 61×
- Poole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-04-26· cited 60×
- Ex Parte LewisSupreme Court of Alabama· 2001-05-25· cited 52×
- Pardue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-09-29· cited 50×
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-09-30· cited 29×
- Prim v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-03-05· cited 28×
- Looney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-12-01· cited 17×
- Elrod v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-05-28· cited 15×
- Heidelberg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-02-01· cited 14×
- Royer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-04-26· cited 13×
- Trice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-03-27· cited 11×
- Felder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-07-28· cited 9×
- Hemrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-06-24· cited 3×
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-03-29· cited 2×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-11-01· cited 2×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1983-10-03· cited 975×
- Habib v. Raytheon Co.Supreme Court· 1982-11-29· cited 161×
- Ex Parte BushSupreme Court of Alabama· 1983-02-11· cited 134×
- United States v. Thomas Meacham, Joseph Ward, Edward William Gilroy, Bobby Gene Hayes and Donald L. MetsgerFifth Circuit· 1980-09-26· cited 128×
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1973-05-17· cited 88×
- Danny Ray Mylar, A/K/A Danny Ray Miles v. State of AlabamaEleventh Circuit· 1982-04-01· cited 67×
- Barbee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-07-27· cited 60×
- United States v. Bobby Gene Hayes, and Joseph WardEleventh Circuit· 1982-05-24· cited 50×
- Longmire v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1982-12-10· cited 37×
- Dingler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1981-09-18· cited 34×
- Miliner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-05-21· cited 27×
- Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-05-14· cited 21×
- Ex Parte JacquesSupreme Court of Alabama· 1982-01-08· cited 14×
- Ex Parte BehelSupreme Court of Alabama· 1981-02-05· cited 14×
- Jacques v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1981-05-05· cited 13×
- Peterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-03-01· cited 10×
- Rickett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-08-30· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.