Skip to main content

Tinsley v. State

Citations

  • 485 So. 2d 1249
  • 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5955

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • wherein the court held that \a void indictment gives the court no jurisdiction to proceed against an accused and the defect of an indictment which fails to charge an offense is not waived by a plea of guilty\
  • wherein the court, in following Dingler , held that \a void indictment gives the court no jurisdiction to proceed against an accused and the defect of an indictment which fails to charge an offense is not waived by a plea of guilty\
  • wherein the court, in following Dingler , held that 'a void indictment gives the court no jurisdiction to proceed against an accused and the defect of an indictment which fails to charge an offense is not waived by a plea of guilty'
  • wherein the court, in following Dingler , held that \a void indictment gives the court no jurisdiction to proceed against an accused and [that] the defect of an indictment which fails to charge an offense is not waived by a plea of guilty\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.