Rickett v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing first degree escape from second and third degrees of escape in that the former requires — under subsection (a)(1) — the averment of use or threat of force

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tinsley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-02-25· cited 18×
• Scarbrough v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-06-14· cited 8×
• Loftin v. City of Montgomery
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-02-26· cited 6×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Summers v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1977-05-24· cited 67×
• Andrews v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1977-01-04· cited 36×
• Thatch v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1981-01-20· cited 20×
• Highsmith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1975-06-17· cited 20×
• Peoples v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-06-08· cited 18×
• Laffity v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-07-27· cited 11×
• Ratchford v. Gay Lib
  Supreme Court· 1978-04-17· cited 10×
• Clency v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-05-18· cited 4×
• Peoples v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-11-02· cited 3×