District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/11/2001
Tinker v. State
Citations
- 784 So. 2d 1198
- 2001 WL 356141
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where there is no evidence as to consent to entry, it is erroneous to include \remaining in\ language
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Salcines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-22· cited 23×
- Foster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-24· cited 18×
- Johnekins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-07· cited 13×
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-16· cited 10×
- Lopez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-12· cited 9×
- Crain v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-01-24· cited 9×
- Yvonne Marie Johnson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-20· cited 7×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-19· cited 4×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-09· cited 1×
- Randolph v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-26
- CARLOS LORENZO GONZALEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-04-19
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.