Tillman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the prosecutors representation to the jury of additional corroborating evidence which he saw no need to present to them was highly improper and prejudicial, necessitating reversal”
• “[T]he prosecutor’s representation to the jury of additional corroborating evidence which he saw no need to present to them was highly improper and prejudicial, necessitating reversal.” (citing Thompson v. State, 318 So.2d 549, 552 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Randall v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-20· cited 18×
• Hazelwood v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-23· cited 12×
• Ramirez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-01-16· cited 7×
• Spencer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-23· cited 4×
• Garland McDowell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-11-19

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-25· cited 1,148×
• Thompson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-08-22· cited 39×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-09-20· cited 10×
• Dupont v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-01-31· cited 9×