Tilley v. USF Holland, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling Commission did not err in finding wife entitled to recover benefits under Schoemehl because claimant was injured in 2003, case was still pending, and wife was added to claim during “Schoemehl window”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).