Bennett v. TREASURER OF STATE OF MO.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to apply Schoemehl because claim was finally adjudicated in 2004; claimant could not later add husband as additional party to ensure he would get dependent benefits under Schoemehl

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).