Skip to main content

Tiller v. Klincar

Citations

  • 561 N.E.2d 576
  • 138 Ill. 2d 1
  • 149 Ill. Dec. 206
  • 1990 Ill. LEXIS 88

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that procedural due process concerns are only raised if a protected liberty interest exists
  • explaining that procedural due process concerns are only raised if a protected liberty interest exists
  • declining to decide whether an inmate has a constitutionally protected interest in parole release and finding that the Board’s determination that granting parole would deprecate the seriousness of the offense was sufficient to satisfy due process, assuming that this interest exists
  • declining to decide whether an inmate has a constitutionally protected interest in parole release and finding that the Board's determination that granting parole would deprecate the seriousness of the offense was sufficient to satisfy due process, assuming that this interest exists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Ward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Tiller v. Klincar

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.