William Heirens v. Larry Mizell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• neither statutory scheme nor rules provide for circumstances under which the Board would be required to grant parole
• parole board had to consider a prisoner's record but could decide against parole despite a good record
• neither statutory scheme nor rules provide for circumstances under which the Board would be required to grant parole
• which held that applying a specific criterion in the statute governing guidelines for awarding parole to an offender sentenced prior to that addition did not violate the ex post facto clause
• which held that applying a specific criterion in the statute governing - 7 - guidelines for awarding parole to an offender sentenced prior to that addition did not violate the ex post facto clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).