Skip to main content
· 7/17/1978

Till v. People

Citations

  • 581 P.2d 299
  • 196 Colo. 126
  • 1978 Colo. LEXIS 802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In the absence of a transcript, we will presume that the findings and conclusions of the trial court are correct, and that the evidence supports the judgment.”
  • “It is the appellant’s duty to designate those portions of the rec ord he deems necessary for an appeal, and to see that the recor d is transmitted.”
  • An appellant “will not be permitted to take advantage of his own failure to designate the pertinent portions of the transcript as part of the record on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carrigan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.