Threlkeld v. Inglett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “laches w[ould] not lie” where the petitioner was “diligent in maintaining contact with the Public Defender” and was “continuously promised assistance”
• for laches to bar relief, state must prove that “petitioner was responsible for the unreasonable delay”
• for laches to bar relief, state must prove that \petitioner was responsible for the unreasonable delay\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).