Warren v. Richmond
Citations
- 53 Ill. 52
Syllabus
<p>1. Fobfeitube of contbact—in what manner it may be declared. Where a vendor of land has a right, by the terms of the contract, to declare a forfeiture in case the purchaser fails to comply on his part, where he holds no securities of a negotiable character, he has only clearly to manifest an intention to end the contract, and, by selling the property to another, he does, in the most unequivocal manner, make his declaration of forfeiture.</p> <p>2. Specific performance—when granted. A purchaser of land will not be entitled to a decree for a specific performance, unless he shows a performance on his part of all the conditions precedent to his right to demand a conveyance.</p> <p>3. Notice—by possession. Where a purchaser of land is in possession, such possession will operate as constructive notice to a subsequent purchaser from the same vendor, of the right of the party in possession.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a defendant’s invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege during his trial testimony “was a matter proper to be considered by the jury”
- holding a defendant’s invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege during his trial testimony “was a matter proper to be considered by the jury”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.