Court of Appeals of Texas· 11/27/1996
Thorn v. State
Citations
- 961 S.W.2d 12
- 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 5666
- 1996 WL 729800
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that probative value of prior convictions in perjury case was not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury when prior felony convictions were relevant to establish element of offense for which appellant was on trial
- holding that probative value of prior convictions in perjury case was not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury when prior felony convictions were relevant to establish element of offense for which appellant was on trial
- holding that probative value of prior convictions in perjury case was not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury when prior felony convictions were relevant to establish element of offense for which appellant was on trial
- holding that probative value of prior convictions in perjury case was not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury when prior felony convictions were relevant to establish element of offense for which appellant was on trial
- holding that probative value of prior convictions in perjury case was not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury when prior felony convictions were relevant to establish element of offense for which appellant was on trial
- “if a jury believes that a perjury defendant thought his statement was true, they would be unable to find that he ‘intended to deceive,’ and acquittal would be required”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wolfe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- De La Paz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-03-25· cited 1,229×
- Paschall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2009-04-02· cited 64×
- Anthony Paschall v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-04-02
- Gilbert Salinas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2002-08-13
- Delapaz, MarkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-03-25
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-01-31· cited 5,788×
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-29· cited 1,851×
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 1,827×
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-02-27· cited 1,350×
- Stone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-15· cited 548×
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-03-27· cited 418×
- Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-02-15· cited 394×
- Bonham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-11-21· cited 331×
- Vanderbilt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-09-23· cited 302×
- Lindley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-07-14· cited 162×
- Hemphill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-02-20· cited 70×
- Farrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-09· cited 45×
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-16· cited 43×
- Smith v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1995-06-21· cited 40×
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1968-03-13· cited 30×
- Farrell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1992-07-31· cited 23×
- Covalt v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-05-19· cited 17×
- Gauthier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-07-11· cited 14×
- Tanner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1984-11-09· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.