Thompson v. United Parcel Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying 1988 version of statute to claim even though statute amended one month after injury
• applying substantial evidence test to factual findings of Alaska Workers' Compensation Board
• \'the disparity is only relevant if past wages do not accurately predict future earning potential. The disparity does not per se indicate a lack of predictive value.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).