Cowen v. Wal-Mart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \the evidence that was sufficient to rebut the presumption of compensa-bility was also sufficient to support the board's determination\ as to the preponderance of the evidence
• noting that evidence sufficient to rebut the presumption was also sufficient to support Board’s decision
• explaining that a reasonable mind could rely on medical opinion to decide that medical problem was not caused by work injury and that this opinion rebutted the presumption
• noting that board reasonably discounted testimony of doctor with limited experience
• explaining same evidence may both rebut presumption of compensability and show by preponderance of evidence that injury was not work-related
• “The evidence that was sufficient to rebut the presumption of compensability was also sufficient to support the [B]oard’s determination that [the claimant] failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence that her injury was work-related.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).