Washington Supreme Court· 5/19/1960
Thompson v. Thompson
Citations
- 352 P.2d 179
- 56 Wash. 2d 244
- 1960 Wash. LEXIS 343
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The custody of the child is not to be used as a reward or punishment for the conduct of the parents. The best interest of the child is the paramount and controlling consideration.” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunter, Donworth, Finley, Rosellini, Ott, Weaver, Mallery, Hill, Foster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Schuster v. SchusterWashington Supreme Court· 1978-10-05· cited 65×
- In Re Custody of HallsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-30· cited 40×
- In re the Custody of HallsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-02-08· cited 40×
- In re the Marriage of McDoleWashington Supreme Court· 1993-10-21· cited 22×
- In Re the Marriage of NordbyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-08-19· cited 11×
- Shaffer v. ShafferWashington Supreme Court· 1963-03-28· cited 10×
- Lunsford v. WaldripCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-02-07· cited 9×
- In Re the Welfare of SegoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-07-24· cited 9×
- Kehus v. EuteneierWashington Supreme Court· 1961-12-15· cited 6×
- Bonn v. BonnCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-12-23· cited 4×
- In re the Marriage of McDoleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-12-10· cited 3×
- MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF McDOLEWashington Supreme Court· 1993-10-21
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.