Skip to main content
· 3/30/2005

In Re Custody of Halls

Citations

  • 109 P.3d 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a petition’s failure to comply with any of the procedural requirements of RCW 26.09.270 meant the court did not have jurisdiction to modify the parties’ parenting plan
  • holding that a petition's failure to comply with any of the procedural requirements of RCW 26.09.270 meant the court did not have jurisdiction to modify the parties' parenting plan
  • stating the superior court “abuses its discretion if it fails to follow the statutory procedures” governing parenting plans

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.