· 3/30/2005
In Re Custody of Halls
Citations
- 109 P.3d 15
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a petition’s failure to comply with any of the procedural requirements of RCW 26.09.270 meant the court did not have jurisdiction to modify the parties’ parenting plan
- holding that a petition's failure to comply with any of the procedural requirements of RCW 26.09.270 meant the court did not have jurisdiction to modify the parties' parenting plan
- stating the superior court “abuses its discretion if it fails to follow the statutory procedures” governing parenting plans
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.