Thompson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the incredible dubiosity doctrine was inapplicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mendoza v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-07-13· cited 74×
• Sallee v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-11-08· cited 39×
• Krumm v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-08-22· cited 30×
• Williams v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-11-24· cited 22×
• Baber v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-07-20· cited 22×
• Whedon v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-02-06· cited 17×
• Erasmo Leyva, Jr. v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-07-25· cited 15×
• Mitchell v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-01-18· cited 7×
• Devries v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-08-31· cited 5×
• Herbert Sheese v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-02-19
• In re the Matter of H.M., a Child In Need of Services, A.A. (Mother) v. The Ind. Dept. of Child Services (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-01-29
• Ronald Graham v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-10-30
• Timothy Samples v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-03-01

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Marcum v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-03-29· cited 90×
• White v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-03-10· cited 48×