Court of Appeals of Maryland· 6/17/1976
Thompson v. State
Citations
- 359 A.2d 203
- 278 Md. 41
- 1976 Md. LEXIS 606
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that common law right to a jury trial exists absent a rule or statute taking the right away where it would be constitutionally permissible to do so
- noting that common law right to a jury trial exists absent a rule or statute taking the right away where it would be constitutionally permissible to do so
- noting that common law right to a jury trial exists absent a rule or statute taking the right away where it would be constitutionally permissible to do so
- stating it may be constitutional to limit access to a jury with respect to charges of petty offenses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elkkidge, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldsidge, O'Donnell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-11-15· cited 132×
- Countess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-12-10· cited 81×
- Kawamura v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-04-09· cited 47×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-10-14· cited 32×
- Hardy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-02-28· cited 30×
- Ashford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-04-19· cited 26×
- State v. HuebnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-03-24· cited 24×
- Vogel v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-09-11· cited 17×
- Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-13· cited 14×
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-02-24· cited 12×
- Kleberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-06· cited 11×
- Crampton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-06-03· cited 11×
- Owens v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-07· cited 11×
- Howard v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-06-25· cited 9×
- Huebner v. District CourtCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-04-08· cited 8×
- Broughton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1979-11-09· cited 6×
- Meanor v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-07· cited 5×
- Ruddy v. First National BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-05-12· cited 4×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-30· cited 4×
- Ruddy v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-09-15· cited 3×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,167×
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 789×
- Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 438×
- District of Columbia v. ClawansSupreme Court· 1937-04-05· cited 381×
- In re StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1880-10-07· cited 85×
- Kramer v. KramerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-06-04· cited 37×
- Gray v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-05-05· cited 34×
- State v. GerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1896-06-05· cited 30×
- Hardisty v. KayCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-02-09· cited 24×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-02-26· cited 19×
- Automatic Retailers of America, Inc. v. Evans Cigarette Service Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-06-08· cited 18×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-06-02· cited 12×
- Ledford Construction Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-06-11· cited 11×
- People ex rel. Borowiak v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1913-07-08· cited 8×
- In Re BerkowitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-06-13· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.