Thompson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pro se defendant’s remarks during rebuttal were not objectively sufficient to justify adjudication of contempt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-09· cited 9×
• Woodie v. Campbell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-07-18· cited 8×
• Michaels v. Loftus
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-02· cited 7×
• MW v. Lofthiem
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-01· cited 6×
• Rudolph v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-13· cited 4×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-30· cited 1×
• Ippolito v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-03· cited 1×
• Gregg v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-10-01

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Krueger v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-08-02· cited 33×
• Thomson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-05-27· cited 28×
• Sewell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-12-12· cited 11×
• Fischer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-03· cited 1×