MW v. Lofthiem

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Neither does M.W.’s admission to prior use of .marijuana constitute indirect crimi nal contempt unless the use violated a valid court order that was in effect at the time he used the drug.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).