Skip to main content
· 3/24/1980

Thompson v. Gillen

Citations

  • 491 F. Supp. 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Holding that one of “reason[s] for strict construction of removal statutes is that the exercise of removal jurisdiction — particularly when based on diversity — is in derogation of State sovereignty.”
  • “Although no motion for remand has been filed by plaintiff, courts of limited jurisdiction, such as this Court, have the duty, sua sponte, to determine in each case their jurisdiction to proceed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warriner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.