Skip to main content
· 1/19/1914

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Cockrell

Citations

  • 232 U.S. 146
  • 34 S. Ct. 278
  • 58 L. Ed. 544
  • 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1421

Syllabus

<p>As the right to remove a cause from a state to a Federal court exists only in enumerated classes of cases, the petition must set forth the . particular facts which bring the case within one of such classes; general allegations and mere legal conclusions are not sufficient.</p> <p>The right of a non-resident defendant to remove the case cannot be defeated by the fraudulent joinder of a resident defendant; but the ■ defendant seeking removal must allege facts which compel the conclusion that the joinder is fraudulent; merely to apply the term “ fraudulent” to the joinder is not sufficient to require the state court to surrender its jurisdiction.</p> <p>Where plaintiff’s statement of his case shows a joint cause of action, as tested by the law of the State, the duty is on the non-resident defendant seeking removal to state facts showing that the joinder was a mere fraudulent device to prevent removal.</p> <p>It is not sufficient for a non-resident railroad corporation, joined as defendant in a suit for personal injuries with two resident employés in charge of the train which did the injury, to show in its petition an absence of good faith on plaintiff’s part in bringing the action at all;— the petition must show that the j oinder itself is fraudulent. .</p> <p>This court, while affirming the judgment of the Court of Appeals of the State, may, as it does in this case, express its disapproval of the reasoning on which it was based.</p> <p>Issues of fact arising upon a petition for removal are to be determined in the Federal court; and, where the petition sufficiently shows a fraudulent joinder and the proper bond has .been given, the state court must surrender jurisdiction, leaving any issue of fact arising on the petition to the Federal court. Weaker v. National Enameling Co., 204 U. S. 176.</p> <p>Where the state court refuses to give effect to a proper petition and bond on removal, the defendant may resort to certiorari from the Federal court to obtain the certifie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the showing of fraudulent joinder must be such to compel the conclusion that joinder is without right and made in bad faith
  • holding that a petition, which stated a good cause of action under state law, did not demonstrate a fraudulent device to prevent a removal unless it was “without any reasonable basis”
  • holding that a petition, which stated a good cause of action under state law, did not demonstrate a fraudulent device to prevent a removal unless it was “without any reasonable basis”
  • stating that “no negligent act or omission personal to the railway company was charged”
  • refusing to find fraudulent joinder on the basis of evidence equally dispositive of the liability of both a diverse defendant and a non-diverse defendant
  • removing party must “compel the conclusion that joinder is without right and in bad faith.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Devanter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.