Skip to main content

Thompson v. Carter

Citations

  • 518 So. 2d 609
  • 1987 WL 914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a package insert was admissible in a medical malpractice case
  • holding that a package insert was admissible in a medical malpractice case
  • stating “[a] witness may qualify as an expert based on his knowledge, skill, experience, training education or a combination thereof”
  • “A witness may qualify as an expert based on his knowledge, skill, experience, training, education or a combination thereof. Qualification as an expert does not necessarily rest upon the educational or professional degree a witness possesses.”
  • “A witness may qualify as an expert based on his knowledge, skill, experience, training, education or a combination thereof. Qualification as an expert does not necessarily rest upon the educational or professional degree a witness possesses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prather

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.