Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 7/18/2011

Thomas West v. Charles Ryan

Citations

  • 652 F.3d 1071
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 26165
  • 2011 WL 2937939

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding evidence could have been discovered by due diligence where it was “undisputed that . . . counsel knew of at least some of the allegations of [purportedly newly discovered evidence]”
  • denying application for leave to file successive 3 petition because evidence of abuse was not “newly discovered” 4 given that petitioner’s counsel was aware “of at least some of 5 the allegations” when petitioner filed his first state habeas 6 petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kleinfeld, Wardlaw, Callahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Thomas West v. Charles Ryan

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.