King v. Trujillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that although counsel could have used new evidence 28 to object to admission of certain evidence at trial, that was 12 1 “irrelevant as to [petitioner’s] actual innocence”
• rejecting the petitioner’s argument that he exercised diligence after appointment of Federal Public Defender because he failed to explain his lack of diligence before the appointment
• affidavit of prosecution witness that he was too intoxicated to recall witnessing the murder, which he had testified to witnessing at trial, was insufficient to show that \no reasonable factfinder\ would have found him guilty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).