Thomas W. Hill v. U.S. Air Force

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that section 1631 “directs a court to transfer an ‘action’ over which it lacks jurisdiction, rather than an individual claim”
• holding district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to transfer claim when transfer was not requested
• considering whether a district court abused its discretion by failing to transfer a ease under 28 U.S.C. § 1631 where the court lacked personal jurisdiction
• “[N]othing in our disposition of this case prevents appellant from seeking to have his official agency records corrected.”
• considering whether a district court lacking personal jurisdiction over nonresident defendant abused its discretion by failing to transfer a cause under § 1631 to a district court with personal jurisdiction
• noting the Privacy Act’s administrative exhaustion requirement for amendment suits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).