Thomas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a comparable jury finding that renders omitted elements mere surplusage is harmless error
• holding that a comparable jury finding that renders omitted elements mere surplusage is harmless error
• noting that it is \necessary to provide the jury with the specific elements of the underlying felony\
• noting that it is \necessary to provide the jury with the specific elements of the underlying felony\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mathews v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2006-06-28· cited 181×
• Ruben Rosales v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2015-01-15· cited 39×
• Taylor v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-03-20· cited 28×
• Taylor v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2010-03-11· cited 13×
• Gibson v. Indiana Department of Correction
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-12-29· cited 8×
• Ruben Rosales v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2014-01-27· cited 5×
• Charles Anthony Taylor v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-02-06
• Nikolas S. Shannon v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-07-22
• Rosales v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2014-01-27
• Alijah Jones v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2024-12-20
• Ryan Matthew Gluys v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2026-02-25

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Neder v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
• Schad v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,454×
• Griffin v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-10-01· cited 84×
• Hobson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-31· cited 43×
• Thomas v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-02-27· cited 1×