Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 441 N.E.2d 441
  • 1982 Ind. LEXIS 1008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the identification testimony sufficiently supported the defendant’s conviction of robbery
  • “A conviction may be sustained by the uncorroborated testimony of a single eyewitness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Givan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.