Thomas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• compulsory process “is a substantive right, a real right, and not an illusory sham to be satisfied by the issue of process, which is to be rendered ineffectual by hastening on to immediate trial”
• compulsory process ‘is a substantive right, a real right, and not an illusory sham to be satisfied by the issue of process, which is to be rendered ineffectual by hastening on to immediate trial’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Crowe v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-11-13· cited 49×
• Weaver v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1981-06-30· cited 32×
• Spencer v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2009-05-01· cited 28×
• McConico v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-08-14· cited 16×
• Pritchett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-01-31· cited 13×
• Young v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-01-22· cited 11×
• King v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-07-05· cited 8×
• Sheffield v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2010-11-05· cited 8×
• McTerry v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-01-19· cited 4×
• McTerry v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1996-07-03· cited 1×