Thomas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that presence of the accused at the scene of an offense is a circumstance tending to prove guilt that, combined with other facts, may suffice to show that the accused was a participant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Dorsey v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2000-09-06· cited 43×
• Mabra v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1999-07-09· cited 43×
• Satchell v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-06-10· cited 35×
• Draper v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1984-08-02· cited 24×
• Blackman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-06-16· cited 17×
• Robinson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-09-07· cited 14×
• Schenck v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-04-21· cited 11×
• Beverly v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1989-01-11· cited 9×
• Collins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-01-24· cited 7×
• Paez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-07-03· cited 6×
• In re D.L.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2018-01-18· cited 6×
• Rivas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1990-04-05· cited 5×
• Rocha v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1990-03-08· cited 4×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-04-28· cited 2×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-05-11· cited 1×
• Wallace v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-09-07· cited 1×
• Hardeway, Fred Malcolm v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-04-11
• Fidel Alexander Ortiz v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-05-04
• James Blackman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-12-22
• Shamika Yvonne Satchell v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-06-10