Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 12/2/2011
Thomas v. State
Citations
- 32 A.3d 503
- 202 Md. App. 386
- 2011 Md. App. LEXIS 166
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- general rule that prior consistent statements are not admissible merely as corroborative evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eyler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-01-10· cited 570×
- People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-12-31· cited 374×
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 320×
- Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-09-10· cited 121×
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-07-02· cited 42×
- McCray v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-08-26· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.