Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 948 So. 2d 968
  • 2007 WL 489231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the parties did not stipulate that the motion to suppress presented a dispositive issue and the trial court did not find that its denial of the motion was dispositive
  • dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the parties did not stipulate that the motion to suppress presented a dispositive issue and the trial court did not find that its denial of the motion was dispositive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.