District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/13/2006
Thomas v. State
Citations
- 921 So. 2d 657
- 2006 WL 66714
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a sentence may have been improper but was not illegal where \the coterminous language was misunderstood by the court and 13 the parties when the original sentence was negotiated and imposed\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fulmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-01-09· cited 189×
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-05-24· cited 163×
- Bover v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-10-04· cited 119×
- Goene v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-03-21· cited 58×
- Moore v. PearsonSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-05-10· cited 26×
- Pate v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-24· cited 16×
- Comtois v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-07· cited 11×
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-22· cited 8×
- Gaston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-06· cited 6×
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-09· cited 6×
- Singletary v. MarchettiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-11· cited 5×
- Spain v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-16· cited 3×
- Bass v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.