Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 238 S.E.2d 888
  • 239 Ga. 734
  • 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The conclusion that a party acted in self-defense is one the jury is permitted, but not required, to draw from the evidence”
  • “The conclusion that a party acted in self-defense is one the jury is permitted, but not required, to draw from the evidence.”
  • review of denial of motion for directed verdict is limited to the legal sufficiency of the evidence
  • prior shooting was relevant to rebut defendant’s “contended innocent intention” of self- defense
  • the incident must be relevant to the particular case on trial and the testimony must be needed; for instance, when there is no direct way for the State to prove the defendant’s beliefs, motives, or state of mind

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall, Jordan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.