Supreme Court of Georgia· 9/27/1977
Thomas v. State
Citations
- 238 S.E.2d 888
- 239 Ga. 734
- 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1314
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The conclusion that a party acted in self-defense is one the jury is permitted, but not required, to draw from the evidence”
- “The conclusion that a party acted in self-defense is one the jury is permitted, but not required, to draw from the evidence.”
- review of denial of motion for directed verdict is limited to the legal sufficiency of the evidence
- prior shooting was relevant to rebut defendant’s “contended innocent intention” of self- defense
- the incident must be relevant to the particular case on trial and the testimony must be needed; for instance, when there is no direct way for the State to prove the defendant’s beliefs, motives, or state of mind
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marshall, Jordan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1982-04-06· cited 100×
- McClesky v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1980-01-24· cited 73×
- Amadeo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1979-05-02· cited 68×
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-01-06· cited 45×
- Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1997-04-28· cited 38×
- Natson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1978-10-31· cited 38×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-02-27· cited 34×
- Veit v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-04-30· cited 28×
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1978-11-30· cited 24×
- Barrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-01-18· cited 21×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-07-10· cited 18×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1978-06-27· cited 17×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-07-10· cited 15×
- Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-05-03· cited 15×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-06-06· cited 14×
- Hargrove v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-02-17· cited 14×
- Buffington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-09-05· cited 13×
- Chadwick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-09-17· cited 11×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2022-06-01· cited 11×
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1991-06-21· cited 10×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bacon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1952-07-14· cited 223×
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1975-10-28· cited 99×
- Proctor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1975-11-24· cited 82×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1910-11-11· cited 82×
- Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1927-10-15· cited 62×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1975-10-28· cited 50×
- Estes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1974-09-06· cited 47×
- Barrow v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1975-12-02· cited 46×
- Larkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1973-04-13· cited 42×
- Cobb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1962-05-14· cited 40×
- Barrow v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1977-06-07· cited 36×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1975-02-05· cited 29×
- McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1976-06-22· cited 25×
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1938-01-06· cited 17×
- Goodman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1937-04-15· cited 15×
- Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1975-09-16· cited 14×
- Ellenburg v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1977-06-28· cited 14×
- McFarlin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1904-11-10· cited 7×
- Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1976-10-26· cited 6×
- Seay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1963-12-04· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.