Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 498 P.2d 1314
  • 88 Nev. 382
  • 1972 Nev. LEXIS 475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the mandatory language in preparing a presentence investigation report, but holding that preparation of the report pursuant to NRS 176.145 was not jurisdictional
  • recognizing the mandatory language 8 in preparing a presentence investigation report, but holding that preparation of the report pursuant to NRS 9 176.145 was not jurisdictional
  • providing that \shall\ is generally construed as mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gunderson, Zenoff, Batjer, Mowbray, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.